Tick Comics imagemap Tick Cartoons imagemap The Live Tick Series imagemap Other Tick books and CD's
imagemap Sound Clips imagemap Video Clips imagemap
Tick Links

Harper's Magazine, March 1997:

This is to confirm that I have received and read the latest outline of the episode and have the following comments:

      It will not be acceptable to have this story revolve around a Unabomber-type villain. In the last outline, there was only one explosion. It happened at the end of the story, underwater, and caused no serious damage. Now the entire story is built around the explosion of bombs. Either the villain and his method of operation need to be changed entirely or the types of
devices he uses need to be presented more in the realm of fantasy. Their effects can still be 1) releasing a deluge of suds in the grocery store, 2) melting the car, or 3) freezing the Tick and Arthur, but they must not be referred to as "bombs", and the villain must not be referred to as an "Evil Bomber".

Page 1: It will not be acceptable for the Four-Legged Man to be a victim of a car-bombing explosion at the Burger Bucket.
Page 2: It will not be acceptable for the Four-Legged Man to be seriously injured with "two splinted legs . . . a neck brace and a head bandage". He may be prevented from teaching his class due to some MINOR injury, or for another reason, such as a common cold or flu or car trouble.
Page 4: It will not acceptable for the villain to be "busy cutting wires, building bombs", or saying, "I am the Evil Bomber, What Bombs at Midnight". He may, however, be portrayed as a mad scientist working on his inventions.
Page 8: Please change the contents of the "shopping cart full of bombs" to soap boxes or something that does not look like a bomb.
Page 9: The store can fill up with soap suds, but please show that the people in the store escape unharmed. They can float out the front doors or some such.
Page 10: Make sure that when the supermarket event is covered on the TV news, the reporter does not refer to "bombs" or an "explosion."
Page 11: The villain's line relating to his intention to blow up the pharmacy "to smithereens, baby" is unacceptable. However, if all direct bombing elements are removed from the script, this line may remain as a figure of speech. Please substitute the label on the bag that reads "Heat Bombs" with something like "Heat Pellets".
Page 13: It will not be acceptable for the villain to say, "There is a bomb on the bus. So I says the bus goes boom, baby."
Page 15: The devices put on the villain's car must be of a fantasy type--something that doesnt result in a harmful explosion. It will not be acceptable for the car to "explode" with the villain still inside it, or for us to see the "charred remains".

From an internal memorandum sent last April to the writing staff of The Tick, a Saturday-morning cartoon on the Fox-TV Network, by Linda Shima-Tsuno, the policy editor of the network's Broadcast Standards and Practices Department. The staff had submitted to the department an outline of a script for a proposed episode entitled "The Tick vs. Continuing Education"; after receiving the memo, the writers abandoned the script.

Posted to the usenet group by '' on 2-12-96;

I am the Web guy at Fox Kids. My name is often cited as the contact
person for complaints regarding the Tick's Schedule, namely the fact
the Tick is not on. Anyway, the best news I can offer is that the Tick
will be back after X-mas. (At least that's what I've been told.)

The truth be told, Fox Kids is looking for ratings for the ages 2-11.
While our Big, blue friend is a brilliant show, it does tend to appeal
an older demo. Plus, Fox Kids is a seperate division from Fox Prime,
while we are "sister" companies, politics are involved.

Anyway, I hope this is of some help.


One again, we see that the entire emphasis of the Tick is small children.

This site made with software.
© 2002 Michael Legg unless specifically noted.
All Tick images are owned by New England Comics, Fox, and Ben Edlund